Saturday, April 13, 2013

Links to my comments

Hey Dr. Fletcher! Here are the links to my 6 comments for Blog Checkpoint #2!












Show and Tell Post #2


            For my second show and tell post I am focusing on the play Grace written by Craig Wright. It was written in 2003 and has been produced a couple of times. In October 2004 the play premiered in Washington D.C. by the Wolly Mammoth Theatre Company at the Warehouse Theater. In 2006 The Furious Theatre Company produced Grace at the Pasadena Playhouse Carrie Hamilton Theatre. Most recently, Grace premiered on Broadway at the Cort Theatre in October 2012. The Broadway show closed only a couple moths later, but it starred Paul Rudd and Michael Shannon! You can buy a copy of this play on Amazon if you click on the following link: http://www.amazon.com/Grace-Play-Craig-Wright/dp/0810128993/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1365884602&sr=1-1&keywords=grace+craig+wright
            Grace is a play revolving around a married couple in their 30's, Steve and Sara, who have just recently moved from Minnesota to Florida to start building and opening Steve's line of hotels. Steve and Sara are extremely religious, looking to God and believing in God for everything. Mr. Himmelman is an investor from Zurich, who promised to sponsor Steve's project.  Steve and Sara have a next-door neighbor named Sam. He is a wealthy man who lost his fiancĂ© six months prior in a horrible car accident. Being neighbors, Sam, Steve and Sara get to know each other very well, and Sam and Sara begin to have an affair. As the affair goes on, so does the building of the hotels. Steve is now just waiting on Mr. Himmelman to wire the large sum of money to the bank so Steve can launch his business. After many months of waiting, Steve is informed the bank is selling the hotels because no money has or will be wired. Steve, overcome with emotion and confusion, wants to move back with Sara to Minnesota and start their life over. However, Sara expresses to him that he wants a divorce. Steve, catching on to what is going on between his wife and Sam, goes over to Sam's apartment, and shoots and kills Sara and Steve.
            One extreme dramaturgical choice in Grace revolves around sequence. Wright puts the very last moment of the story and makes it the first scene of the play. So the play opens with a gunshot and two dead bodies lying on the floor. From there, time moves backwards. The dead bodies, Sara and Sam, get up and the conversation had right before Steve shot Sam and Sara continues, still moving backwards in time. After this first scene, the sequence begins chronologically all the way till the end of the play. The last scene of the play ends with the same conversation that was going backwards in the first scene, and the last moment is Steve just about to shoot Sam and Sara. I think Wright chose to play with sequencing so foreshadowing and dramatic irony is created. Wright wants to give a taste of what happens to the characters in the play before the story begins because it lets the audience know what to look out for and what is of upmost importance. Another dramaturgical choice in Grace is that both Sara and Steve's apartment and Sam's apartment are seen on stage at all times. So, when a scene takes place in Sam's apartment, you see Sara and Steve working, interacting, and responding in their own apartment. I think Wright chose to do this to show two completely opposite worlds interacting.  Also, he does this to emphasize the transition of Sara and Steve together and Sam alone, to Sara and Sam together and Steve alone. This creates a lot of visual and emotional tension, which also represents the tension all of the characters are going through. Grace has now become on of my favorite plays, based on the brilliant dramaturgical choices and fascinating subject matter.  

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Detroit Response


So, I think I am going to go for the more challenging question and tackle why D'Amour's play is called Detroit? My first assumption before reading it, which was soon proven wrong, was that the play was set in Detroit, Michigan. Though as you mentioned, it is especially odd because D'amour describes in the setting that the play is set "not necessarily [in] Detroit." D'amour follows that statement with: "However, we are in a 'first ring' suburb outside of a mid-sized American city." So, the city of Detroit could definitely qualify as being the setting. Having said all of that, I believe the play is called Detroit because Detroit is a city that suggests such concern over the economy like no other city. Detroit went from being a huge money- maker to one of the poorest cities in the country. It went from being extremely populated to extremely deserted. Money is a huge topic of conversation in D'amour's play. For example, the way Mary tries to present her home to her guests by showing off expensive foods. Also, the way Kenny and Sharon are beyond poor with not but two pieces of furniture in their house. When I think about the city of Detroit, I think about the economy and money. I think about the people who left Detroit because there was no money to be made, and the people who stayed in Detroit, who grew dirt poor. It also makes me think about how the people who stayed in Detroit after the economy crashed, probably stayed because it was their home. It was not about the money, but about neighbors and family. The title, Detroit, pertains to not only the financial state of the city itself, but also the community that once made up the city, and the community that makes up the city today. 

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Water By the Spoonful Response


The second half of Scene eight is one part of Water By The Spoonful in which realities interact. In this part of the scene, Orangutan is online and Elliot accidently types into the thread, speaking as his mom, also known as Haikumom. Elliot starts writing personal questions, asking about what it is like be on crack. Orangutan immediately catches on that it is not Odessa writing, but someone else. Elliot, Odessa's son, admits that it is him. Orangutan then asks and comfort Elliot on his past overdoses and mentions that there are other online forums for pain medication users. As Orangutan continues, Elliot discovers that his mother shared all of his confidential information to her online friends, most of which Yaz did not even have knowledge of. Hudes has these particular realities intersecting at this particular moment in the plot in this particular way because this online website has been Elliot's mom's life for so long, and though Elliot knew of it, he did not know the extent of what was talked about. This moment reveals the point in which Elliot is fully exposed to the secret life his mom has been living, and the point in which Orangutan is exposed to the effects outside of the thread that she spends the majority of her day on. Hudes chooses to have the worlds intersect at this particular moment because in the moment before, Elliot fought face to face with his mom about how she was not there for him. So Hudes creates a climactic moment when, after a heated argument with his mother, he finds that she has been making him a story on a website. Suddenly, the place that Odessa, Orangutan, and many others considered their support system, is now what is hurting others and being ripped apart. 

Monday, March 18, 2013

Buried Child Response


Sam Shepard's Buried Child represents theatrical realism on the surface, but there are definitely elements that counter the presentational conventions of illusionistic realism.  The major incident that comes to mind is the idea that none of Vince's family recognizes him. For example, Vince enters the house and Dodge claims to have no idea who he is. It is even more unrealistic when Shelly asks Vince's father, Tilden, " Is he your son? Do you recognize him!" and Tilden responds, "I had a son once but we buried him." The way Shepard creates Vince's father, grandfather, and family to claim he is a stranger is surrealistic and counters the illusionistic realism the majority of the play portrays. A bit of complexity arises in the play when talking about the crops in the backyard. Sheldon claims that there is bundles of fresh corn out back, but Dodge and Halie say that there has not been corn out there since 1935. In the end of the play, Halie contradicts herself by saying, " I've never seen such corn. Tall as a man already. It's like a paradise out there." Shepard portrays multiple truths, causing complexity and creating a non-illusionistic view. Also, the attitudes and characteristics of the characters do not fully represent "a slice-of-life". What I mean by this is that every character has an extreme personality, creating a world that you do not see everyday. For example, Bradley has a wooden leg and sticks his hand in people’s mouths, Shelly screams at people she does not know, and Dodge drowned a baby. Those are just three examples out of the seven characters, but that already makes for quite an insane and surreal world. As much as Buried Child represents illusionistic realism, there are many elements that counter the presentational conventions. 

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Noises Off Response


When thinking about a motif for Noises Off, the first idea that comes to mind is, "confusing". Though that is right along the lines of the motif, "miscommunications" which you could apply to every farce. So thinking deeper for a motif that others would miss on their first read-through would be, "baggage". What I mean by this is the characters do not stop talking of experiences they have had with one another, and in result, it influences every interaction they have with each other. The fascinating thing about Noises Off is that you see the relationships between the actors just as much as the relationship between the characters. It is obvious how much baggage each actor has, and how greatly it influences his or he performance in Nothing On. For example, Dotty, being in an unhappy relationship Gary, cannot stop crying on and off stage in the second act. Her experience with her cast mate greatly changes the way she plays Mrs. Clackett because there is so much more going on between her and Roger. Also, literally there is a lot of baggage because there are dozens of props that the actors constantly forget and get yelled at about. The motif "baggage" arises a lot because the characters cannot help but bring themselves and the relationships they have had with one another into their character in Nothing On. A good "tag line" for Noises Off would be, "And on we blindly stumble!" Lloyd says this line and I think it is the driving force of not only Noises Off, but also the play within the play, Nothing On. The major dramatic question asks whether the cast will get through the play. The actors accomplish this only by blindly stumbling through it!  

The Glass of Water Response


In The Glass of Water, it is hard to pick out the protagonist because there are many important stories going on at the same time revolving around different characters. Though if I had to choose, I would say Masham and Abigail are the protagonists together. I say this because The Glass of Water is, in part, a story revolving around love. What I mean by that is the major dramatic question is: Will Masham and Abigail be together? One might say that Bolingbrook is the protagonist because he gets the most stage time. But the majority of Bolingbrook’s problems revolve around the war which is not the prominent conflict in the story! So even though Masham and Abigail do not get the majority of stage time, I still deem them as the protagonist. Also Scribe makes it so the audience roots and feels for the couple. One way he does that is by portraying Abigail as just a poor, sweet jewelers assistant. We automatically feel sympathy for Abigail and want her to finally be happy with Masham. Determining the protagonist of every play you are analyzing is very important, but I get the feeling that it is not the most important order of business in a well-made play. The plot is a lot stronger than the character in most well-made plays, and in this particular play there is not one, but multiple secrets revolving around every character. Therefore I do not believe the play would have appeared differently if you looked at Anne, the Queen of England, as the protagonist. The majority of secrets are equally important, and I believe the majority of characters are too.