Sunday, May 5, 2013

Last Show and Tell Post


            For my last show and tell post, I am analyzing the play called Big Mistake by Theresa Rebeck. Theresa Rebeck is most commonly known as the creator of Smash, the TV show. Three of her plays were on Broadway, and many showed Off-Broadway. Big Mistake is a one-act play written and published in 1999. The only account found of Rebeck's show being performed is when Ron Piretti directed it at Marymount Manhattan College.
            Big Mistake revolves around four characters. The whole play takes place in a bar. The show starts off with two male characters, Brian and Paul, two friends in their early thirties, who are in the bar. They are drinking and talking about past hook-ups in not a very respectful manner. Soon after Lorna and Annie, two friends in their early thirties walk in. They are chatting about past hook-ups when Lorna notices Brian, a guy she previously dated. They debate whether to escape the situation, but it is already too late as they notice Brian making his way over. Brian offers to buy the ladies a drink, and though they resist multiple times, he does it anyway. As Brian and Lorna start to chat, Paul comes over and starts to hit on Annie. Each "couple" is having conversing at the same time, but separate from each other. Brian and Lorna start to talk about their lives since the break-up and Paul tries to get to know Annie even though she is not interested. As the couples becomes extremely feisty with each other, Brian and Paul give a monologue about how confusing women are and it is followed with monologues from Annie and Lorna about how confusing men are. The play ends with Paul and Annie leaving to go on a dinner date and Lorna and Brian leave to go sleep together.
            One dramaturgical choice made by Rebeck is at the very beginning of the play when she notes, "Because there is so much hostility between the men and women for most of the piece, it is important that the actors play against that hostility with a veneer of politeness and social agility. This veneer is, of course, worn through rather quickly." It is not often that authors make a detailed note about how the actors should play their character. I think this is a smart dramaturgical choice on Rebeck's part because the dialogue in the script naturally gives the vibe of aggression, harshness, and argumentative. So, it is natural that the actors are going to automatically play it like that. Though since there is a note that they should play the opposite of the hostility, it will make for a much more compelling and complex show. It will make the characters three dimensional instead of just labeling all of them as "mean" or "bitchy". Another dramaturgical choice made by Rebeck is at the end of the play when Lorna and Annie are instructed to say their monologues at the same time, even though they say different words. The same situation happens with Brian and Paul's monologues. I think this is a very interesting dramaturgical choice because their monologues are of the same subject, but with completely different words. Also, it is important because it shows how it is not about the individual characters, but just about the men and then just about the women. It is grouping them together to get the message across about woman and men in general relationships. Big Mistake was a really entertaining play and I am definitely going to read more of Theresa Rebeck's work.   

Comments for LAST Blog Checkpoint


http://yvettebourgeoisthtr2130.blogspot.com/2013/04/fires-in-mirror-by-smith_13.html?showComment=1366677056749#c7781891074357220485

http://yvettebourgeoisthtr2130.blogspot.com/2013/04/three-viewings-by-jeffery-hatcher.html?showComment=1367694650875#c8087442699316648829

http://yvettebourgeoisthtr2130.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-drowsy-chaperone.html?showComment=1367695039832#c4155757783487396552

http://samcosby2130.blogspot.com/2013/05/show-and-tell-3.html?showComment=1367720497854#c5527023845924495508

http://blakesilviotrifles.blogspot.com/2013/05/on-verge.html?showComment=1367720740703#c5014259150520999307

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Three Viewings Response


Three Viewings is not like any play I have encountered before because it only deals with three characters who do no interact at all. Each spends a very long time on stage and their stories all revolve around the dead, but they never actually see one another. One hidden common point of reference in each of the three monologues is in the coffin. In the first monologue, Tell- Tale, Emil shares his experience reaching into the coffin of Terri. He describes, " I smooth the crow's feet around her eyes. I do...what we do...to her yes, her lips. What we do is...we seal them". The second monologue, The Thief of Tears, also shares this point of reference, in the coffin. Mac describes in detail about how she goes to console the deceased person just to steal their jewelry. She describes, " I close my eyes, bite my lips, and the tears well up. I bend over to kiss Miriam good-bye...two pecks on the corpse on either side of the face." She takes the audience right into the coffin with her, just like Emil did. The last monologue, Thirteen Things about Ed Carpolotti, Virginia takes us into the same location, into her husband's, Ed's, coffin. She expresses while observing her deceased husband, " He's dead wearing bifocals and a hairpiece....the cufflinks shaped like bulldozers...All of his hair on these little white heads." All three characters share this common point of reference in the location of a coffin. It is not something one would easily pick up on in the script, but if you really look into it, you can see this location a commonality in all three monologues.